>Interesting idea. If I read the WSDL spec correctly, the soap:address is
>not absolutely required for legal WSDL.
That's my understanding - isn't one of the big features of WSDL the
separation of address from service description?
>I don't think we can get away with your idea, though, because it goes
>against JAX-RPC which requires the no-parameter get method, while the other
>get method is merely optional. We COULD always print out a non-compliance
>warning if we don't find an address, and then do what you do. What do
>others think?
I think late binding to a specific physical address is valuable. The
API already lets you change the endpoint at runtime, why shouldn't it
be optional at proxy generation time?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. . . . . . . . http://www.media.mit.edu/~nelson/
