On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 01:43 , R J Scheuerle Jr wrote:

> Talked to Glen and Tom on the chat, and they think that 
> InternationalPrice
> should extend String.
> <snip>
> Comments ?
>

String is final, as are the primitive type wrapper classes.

+Melissa

> Rich Scheuerle
> XML & Web Services Development
> 512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)
>
>
>
>                       Simon Fell
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       axis-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>                       co.uk>                   cc:
>                                                Subject:  Re: 
> complexType extending a simpleType
>                       02/21/2002 03:25
>                       PM
>                       Please respond to
>                       axis-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> FWIW, I ran into this doing the Group D doc/literal interop tests for
> pocketSOAP, and took exactly the same approach.
>
> Cheers
> Simon
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:12:03 -0600, in soap you wrote:
>
>> According to XML Schema Primer 0 Chapter 2.5.1, a complexType can be
>> derived from a simple type to add attribute information.
>>
>>
>> Lets say you had the following schema:
>>
>> <complexType name="purchaseItem">
>>     <complexContent>
>>          <sequence>
>>              <element name="itemName" type="xsd:string" />
>>              <element name="price" type="xsd:string" />
>>          </sequence>
>>     </complexContent>
>> </complexType>
>>
>> The above could be sent over the wire as:
>>
>> <purchaseItem>
>>  <itemName>
>>    Widget
>>  </item>
>>  <price>
>>   1.00
>>  </price>
>> <purchaseItem>
>>
>> And the above would be modeled as a java bean named PurchaseItem with 
>> two
>> String properties.
>>
>>
>> Now let's say you extend this for an international market, thus the 
>> price
>> needs to know the
>> currency.  Since it is closely tied to the price, you want to represent
>> currency as an
>> attribute on price.   Here's how to represent this in xml schema.
>>
>> <complexType name="internationalPrice">
>>    <complexContent>
>>        <simpleContent>
>>            <extension base="xsd:string"/>
>>                <attribute name="currency" type="xsd:string">
>>            </extension>
>>        </simpleContent>
>>    <complexContent>
>> </complexType>
>>
>> <complexType name="purchaseItem">
>>     <complexContent>
>>          <sequence>
>>              <element name="itemName" type="xsd:string" />
>>              <element name="price" type="tns:internationalPrice" />
>>          </sequence>
>>     </complexContent>
>> </complexType>
>>
>> So this means that price is an element whose value is a string and 
>> has a
>> currency attribute.
>>
>> Here is an example over the wire:
>>
>> <purchaseItem>
>>  <itemName>
>>    Widget
>>  </item>
>>  <price currency="USDollars">
>>   1.00
>>  </price>
>> <purchaseItem>
>>
>>
>> We don't support extension of simpleTypes yet.  When we do, we need
>> to generate a PurchaseItem bean (as before) and a InternationalPrice 
>> bean.
>>
>> However, note that the InternationalPrice has a "raw" value that is
>> serialized
>> directly...not within an element and not as an attribute value.  The
>> serializer and deserializer need to know about this raw value, and the
> bean
>> requires
>> a special property name to get to the raw value.  (I propose getValue 
>> and
>> setValue
>> accessors, which match what we do with enumeration classes...our other
> kind
>> of simpleType).
>>
>> So both emitters, bean serializer, and bean deserializer will need to 
>> have
>> extra code to support this feature.  (Note that this is an optional
> JAX-RPC
>> feature).
>>
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Rich Scheuerle
>> XML & Web Services Development
>> 512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to