I think a tag something like <list> would work great, which follows the
same convention for <map>.
Since Collection type are widely used...it would make sense to me to make
the adjustment.
What I don't know, and should probably recieve input from if this is
acceptable or violates a spec requirement.
Thanks,
David Cole
"R J
Scheuerle Jr" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com> Subject: Re: Methods Returning ArrayList
converted to Object[] in
WSDLToJava
02/21/2002
03:50 PM
Please
respond to
axis-dev
How do you think Java2WSDL should interpret a return type of ArrayList ?
(
If you could provide an alternate xml representation other than type
="SOAP-ENC:Array" I could
change Java2WSDL/WSDL2Java to honor it. I don't know anything about
<list>...maybe this is the answer ?
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
"David L. Cole"
<DLCole@cmsenergy To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com> cc:
Subject: Methods Returning
ArrayList converted to Object[] in WSDLToJava
02/21/2002 03:32
PM
Please respond to
axis-dev
I am trying to use the WSDLTOJava to generate the client stubs and found
that If I have a method in my class which has
a return type of ArrayList (i.e public ArrayList foo() ), The generated
WSDL will show the return type as:
<wsdl:part name="return" type="SOAP-ENC:Array" />
After running WSDLTOJava , the generated stub will then have a return type
of Object[] i.e:
public java.lang.Object[] foo()
Is it possible to have the WSDL generated so that it correctly depicts the
return type as the expected ArrayList?
Thanks,
David Cole
