At first I thought this was a good idea. But now that the idea has
fermented in my brain for a few hours, I now think this is a BAD idea. If
we put something into axis that's really part of something else, then we
should rename it. Otherwise, if some user picks up axis and then picks up
that something-else, then there could be two versions of the same classes
and this could result in name and behaviour conflicts.
So I'll stick with my vote for 2.b.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS on 03/18/2002 03:22:56 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: clutil.jar vs excalibur-cli.jar - get rid of them!
Tom Jordahl wrote:
>
> A possibility is to check the excalibur-cli.jar file in to our tree
> and when we build axis.jar, we include all the class files in
excalibur-cli.jar
> in it.
>
> This removes the big problem of having another (really small and
uninteresting)
> jar file from the CLASSPATH but allows us to stay in sync with the code.
>
> The problem with this is I don't grok ant well enough to do it myself.
Insert the following some place prior to the actual <jar> task.
<unzip src="${excalibur.jar}" dest="${build.dest}" />
- Sam Ruby
P.S. Do not construe the above as a vote... I'm merely answering a
technical question.
