What
do you mean by "supporting classes"? The only particularly handy thing I
can see that process generating is the WSDD files. Am I missing
something?
That
said, an option which prevents overwriting existing files doesn't seem like a
bad idea, although we should print clear messages which say "NOT writing
MyClassSOAPStub.java - an existing file is in the way",
etc....
--Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: Volkmann, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Java2WSDL followed by WSDL2Java?Is it reasonable to assume that developers will commonly want to
generate WSDL for a service using Java2WSDL
for the purpose of feeding that WSDL into WSDL2Java
to achieve the ultimate goal of generating
the supporting classes needed by the service?It seems to me that this will be common. The only problem I see with this is that WSDL2Java will overwrite the data classes used by the service implementation and will overwrite the service implementation itself with a new interface.
Should a flag be added to WSDL2Java so it can be told not to overwrite existing files?
***************************************************************************************
WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.
***************************************************************************************
