On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:37:56 -0500 , in soap you wrote: >>Are you aware of any other vendors that use the "wrapped" style? Don't you >>think that using a part name (and the fact that there is only one) as a >>means of discriminating between "document" and "wrapped" is fairly delicate? >>I appreciate that this might be pedantry, but what if I wanted "document", >>not "wrapped" and named the single part "parameters"? > >> I believe that the IONA folks are supporting this as well. I agree >> with you that keying off the part name is a pretty flaky approach. > >What would you think we should key from? This is fairly reliable right now as this >is how Microsoft (and others?) are creating the WSDL.
Ideally, the definition of rpc/literal would be fixed, so that this style of use becomes rpc/literal. In the mean time, i think it should be a tool option, and not driven by things in the WSDL >It is likely that in the future we will provide a WSDL2Java switch to turn off this >heuristic >and just do straight-up doc/lit stuff. cool. :) Cheers Simon
