Russell,
Currently, it doesn't seem that the generated skeleton classes provide any benefit. I'm sure you have in mind some future benefits that I'm not aware of. Can you share some of the benefits you anticipate?
My current mode of operation is to modify the generated deploy.wsdd file to point to my own implementation class, bypssing use of the generated skeleton classes.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Skeleton vs deploy.wsdd for metadata
>
>
> Hey, Glen! I THOUGHT we agreed that:
> 1. If we don't generate the skel, the metadata is in deploy.wsdd
> 2. If we generate the skel, the metadata is in the skel and
> NOT in the
> deploy.wsdd.
>
> Take a look at build/working/test/wsdl/sequence. This test
> follows #2. It
> has a skeleton which has metadata which you can get by calling
> getOperationDescByName. But the deploy.wsdd ALSO has the
> metadata. What's
> worse, there is NO CODE in the runtime that calls
> getOperationDescByName!!!
> So the metadata ALWAYS comes from the deploy.wsdd.
>
> Russell Butek
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
***************************************************************************************
WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.
***************************************************************************************
