Sorry, mea culpa! We're doing this for doc/lit, not for SOAP arrays - I was looking at a test which I thought was RPC style, but it's doc/lit. Never mind. :)
--Glen > -----Original Message----- > From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ArrayOfInt > > > We were generating int[]. Has this changed ? > > Rich Scheuerle > XML & Web Services Development > 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115) > > > > > Glen Daniels > > <gdaniels@macrome To: > "'Axis-Dev (E-mail)'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > dia.com> cc: > > Subject: > ArrayOfInt > 04/18/2002 09:39 > > AM > > Please respond to > > axis-dev > > > > > > > > > > Guys, why are we generating "beans" for things like integer > arrays? When a > WSDL indicates an "ArrayOfInt" type, that's just shorthand which is > necessary because we need a way of "subclassing" SOAP arrays > to type them > in schema-land. We should be just using "int[]" in this case, no? > > --Glen > > >
