DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8296>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8296 WSDL2Java forces use of namespace prefix in type attribute value ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-04-24 15:05 ------- Thanks for your comments. I was messing around with the included file and had sent up the wrong one. I am still curious about the xmlns= thing. For example, if I have an instance that looks like this: <?xml version="1.0" ?> <doc> <a>bugs?</a> </doc> Then presumably I could right a schema that looks like this: <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";> <xsd:element name="doc"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="a" type="xsd:string"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:element> </xsd:schema> With no xmlns= ... It seems to me that you would have this problem whenever you converted a DTD to a Schema. Is that not a consideration? Then my WSDL would refer to it like this: <wsdl:message name="currentInput"> <wsdl:part name="composite" element="doc" /> </wsdl:message> In the Schema Structures document (3.15.2) there is a paragraph that states: "Since the empty string is not a legal namespace name, supplying an empty string for targetNamespace is incoherent, and is not the same as not specifying it at all. The appropriate form of schema document corresponding to a .schema. whose components have no {target namespace} is one which has no targetNamespace attribute specified at all." Just trying to get some clarity on all this, so thanks for your help.
