----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Butek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:40 Subject: Re: Revamped WSDL2Java framework
> Do folks think this is a reasonable revamp? I haven't heard from anyone > except dims, and dims (except for a couple bugs he found) is OK with it. > My next question is packaging. I packaged it like I did to avoid > interfering with the existing emitter code. But if I replace the existing > code with the new stuff I'd rather do something a bit more sensible. We > have 3 items: > > 1. symbol table classes > 2. framework classes > 3. WSDL2Java implementation classes > > Here's my proposal: > 1. org.apache.wsdl.symbolTable > 2. org.apache.wsdl > 3. WSDL2Java.java in org.apache.axis.wsdl (like it is now) and the rest in > org.apache.axis.wsdl.toJava > > A question is, CAN I even put 1 & 2 where I suggest? It pulls them out of > the axis subpackage, but they're logically outside of AXIS anyway. > > Russell Butek > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want the ant tasks to go into the main distro, rather in test, and have some changes to the existing task to make it more robust (that I will repost again in a week) I'd also like some form of dependency checking in the task...if the date of the generated files is later than that of the source file, you shouldnt generate the output files. It is hard to add this ina build file outside of the task, as it is only when you parse the WSDL that you know what the names of the classes will be
