Axis does not send the contents of the faults over the wire.
1) I propose making changes to the Axis code to serializer/deserialize the contents of a user fault within
a <contents> element within the <details> element.
Does this seem reasonable ? Tom, you implemented the initial fault mapping support. Do you remember
why the contents of the fault are not sent over the wire ? Is there any specification which defines the wire format
for the contents of a fault ?
2) I don't want to do this for all exceptions, just the user faults declared in the wsdl file. So perhaps we need
an AxisUserFault which extends AxisFault. And the emitted exceptions should extend AxisUserFault ?
Comments please!
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
| Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/22/2002 08:48 AM
|
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: Chat |
Because the w3c ws-desc conference call is 8AM pacific on Thursdays....
I would think this could be either a bi-weekly or as-needed call, and as such we could do it on Wednesdays, with an agenda informed by the previous day's chat. Thoughts?
--G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Chat
>
>
> I prefer Thursday rather than Friday. Why not 8:00 am Pacific time ?
>
> This is a great idea.
>
> Rich Scheuerle
> XML & Web Services Development
> 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
>
>
>
>
> Russell
>
> Butek/Austin/IBM@ To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> IBMUS cc:
>
> Subject: Re:
> Chat
> 05/22/2002 07:43
>
> AM
>
> Please respond to
>
> axis-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I, too, would prefer days other than Friday. And I'd prefer slightly
> earlier, too. 8:30-9:30 Pacific would work for me.
> Wednesday would be
> better than Thursday for me, though having it the day after
> the chat would
> be a bit silly, so from that point of view, Thursday would be
> better (and I
> could probably deal with it). Would this be a weekly call?
>
> Glen, there were only 3 of us on the chat yesterday (Rich,
> Glyn, and I).
> We discussed very little. Beta 3 was brought up, but we
> didn't think we'd
> done enough to justify one yet, particularly since we should
> whittle away
> bugzilla a bit first. And there is an issue about WS-I wrt
> the server-side
> supporting doc/lit. I'll craft a separate note on that question.
>
> Russell Butek
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Glyn Normington/UK/IBM@IBMGB on 05/22/2002 03:13:21 AM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Chat
>
>
>
>
> >Perhaps we can try every Friday morning, say 9:00-10:00 AM
> Pacific time?
>
> I'm afraid, that's too late on a Friday for me. I could usually manage
> 8:00-9:00 AM Pacific time but I suppose that's too early for
> some people.
>
> Slightly later alternatives which I could make are 8:30-9:30
> on Wednesday
> or Thursday mornings.
>
> Glyn
>
>
>
>
>
>
