So in
other words we dealt with even more ambiguity than is allowed by WSDL?
Cool! Should we (or WSDL4J?) be checking for this when parsing the
WSDL?
--G
-----Original Message-----
From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Clash Testcase Changes
The WSDL4J folks informed us that the test/wsdl/clash.wsdl file is invalid.
According to WSDL 2.4.5 "The name attribute of the input and output elements provices a unique name among all input and output elements within the enclosing port type".
I am making changes to the clash testcase to comply.
FYI,
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
