Rich Scheuerle wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up, Glen. Oops I guess you didn't give me a heads up. We >need this to be put back in immediately. > > Letting me know after the fact is not an appropriate way to make a point. > > Please take out your changes and we can discuss this on the Tuesday chat. Or are >conceeding that no else's opinion matters.
Come on, lets play nice now boys and girls. The proper way to handle this, per http://xml.apache.org/decisions.html, is as follows: -1 - "No." On issues where consensus is required, this vote counts as a veto. All vetos must contain an explanation of why the veto is appropriate. Vetos with no explanation are void. No veto can be overruled. If you disagree with the veto, you should lobby the person who cast the veto. Voters intending to veto an action item should make their opinions known to the group immediately so that the problem can be remedied as early as possible. - Sam Ruby
