Glyn wrote: > Also, I wonder if we should be consistently using the cvs contents such as > the docs to describe facts and the cvs commit logs to summarise *changes* > to the facts? I don't like seeing useful design notes get 'hidden' in cvs > logs.
Glyn and I must be on the same wavelength today. I also prefer my source control to have descriptions of the changes that are concise. On the flip side, reading a detailed CVS commit is very helpful while trying to puzzle out the code changes from the diffs. I also agree in principle that we should try and document changes before and after they are made. But I also have reservations that there is still much that is missing or doesn't work right in Axis, and in order to get to 1.0, we need to concentrate on implementing these missing pieces. -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia
