"Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sanjiva Weerawana wrote: > > > > I have no doubt my MSFT co-authors of WSDL 1.1 would totally > > agree that that WSDL is wrong. > > That addresses my concern - namely that the authors might disagree on this > point. Thanks! > > - Sam Ruby
I don't know what there is to disagree with- the spec is totally unambiguious that the parameters listed must be part names. No amount of creating interpretation can change that. Does the doc/lit approach in .net depend on this technique to establish the stub signatures? If so its just wrong. Sanjiva.
