Perhaps a working group should be launched to explore the issue. Think we
need a "Casing Architecture"? Should only take about 2 years to get a
draft spec out.
The IBM way of casing it is the correct way of casing it, of course. ;-)
Seriously, the most common use I've seen is "Web Services" capital W and
capital S.
- James M Snell/Fresno/IBM
Web services architecture and strategy
Internet Emerging Technologies, IBM
544.9035 TIE line
559.587.1233 Office
919.486.0077 Voice Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programming Web Services With SOAP, O'reilly & Associates, ISBN
0596000952
==
Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be terrified,
do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you
go.
- Joshua 1:9
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "axis-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: is it Web Service, or web service, or Web service
Silly Q.
What is the casing of 'web service'. MS has Web Service; Sun, W3C and IBM
have Web service.
I ask as it is suddenly an issue for me that copy editors are complaining
about. I dont use capital W for web, so may just go to lower case for both
words.
Sigh,
steve
NB: if we cant even get consistent interoperability in casing of the
concept, how on earth are we going to get distributed transactions
exchanging complex collection datatypes and with binary attachments, using
federated authentication, to work?
