This seems silly. Why not remove the method from the unit test case
entirely?
>dims 2002/06/13 10:19:43
>
> Modified: java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
> Log:
> comment initDOMFactory as rsitze renamed it to getDOMFactory AND made it private :-)
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.11 +2 -2 xml-axis/java/test/utils/TestXMLUtils.java
>
> Index: TestXMLUtils.java
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-axis/java/test/utils/TestXMLUtils.java,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11
> --- TestXMLUtils.java 18 Oct 2001 13:28:39 -0000 1.10
> +++ TestXMLUtils.java 13 Jun 2002 17:19:43 -0000 1.11
> @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@
>
> public void testInit()
> {
> - DocumentBuilderFactory dbf = XMLUtils.initDOMFactory();
> - assertNotNull("Did not get a DocumentBuilder Factory", dbf);
> + //DocumentBuilderFactory dbf = XMLUtils.initDOMFactory();
> + //assertNotNull("Did not get a DocumentBuilder Factory", dbf);
> }
>
> public void testNewDocumentNoArgConstructor()
>
>
