Oh, I see.
So I are we now generating jax-qname.jar for our version? --Glen > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeremy Hughes; Paul Fremantle > Subject: Re: [jsr110-eg-disc] Re: WSDL4J updated... > > > Matthew Duftler wrote: > > > Hi Sam, > > > > > I'm a bit concerned about the inclusion of the > > javax.xml.namespace.QName class in wsdl4j.jar. It seems to me that > > having it there might cause confusion. > > >Can this class be excluded? > > > > And where would WSDL4J get this class from? > > > > Just to be clear - I have no problem to the source of this > being in the > WSDL4J CVS tree. Just if you put the generated class for this into a > jar, please put it into a separate JAR. IMHO, The only javax classes > that should be in wsdl4j.jar should be ones in the package javax.wsdl. > > - Sam Ruby >
