DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10058>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10058

WSDL2Java should not fail on valid schema





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-06-21 13:48 -------
I agree in principle, but disagree with your example.

The emitter currently does understand xsd:choice and it understands anonymous 
xsd:group elements.  In both cases these are mapped similar to 
xsd:sequence/xsd:all.  So I would be against mapping these to SOAPElement, but 
I would be in favor of completing the mapping for these types.  (Certainly we
could issue a message..)

I agree that xsd:list should be mapped to SOAPElement, for now.

I think that this defect is too general for all the work that you anticipate.

What we really need is an Axis J->W and W->J document describing the mappings
that Axis supports (or doesn't support) and proceed from there.

Reply via email to