DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10058>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10058 WSDL2Java should not fail on valid schema ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-06-21 13:48 ------- I agree in principle, but disagree with your example. The emitter currently does understand xsd:choice and it understands anonymous xsd:group elements. In both cases these are mapped similar to xsd:sequence/xsd:all. So I would be against mapping these to SOAPElement, but I would be in favor of completing the mapping for these types. (Certainly we could issue a message..) I agree that xsd:list should be mapped to SOAPElement, for now. I think that this defect is too general for all the work that you anticipate. What we really need is an Axis J->W and W->J document describing the mappings that Axis supports (or doesn't support) and proceed from there.