Mark Baker wrote: > Sam wrote; > >>axis-dev would be a good place to discuss such plans. Got any? ;-) > > Not anything concrete yet. I'm still familiarizing myself with Axis, > as I've never used it. I'm here because Roy suggested I drop you guys a > line.
Cool! >>While the reference to the WebMethodFeature does mention GET, it seems >>to be light on specifics. Is there some place I should look for more >>details? > > Hmm, really? That's a concern. Would you mind raising a Last Call > comment to that effect? To be honest, I don't understand the politics and stakeholders involved in this discussion. > The basic idea, which Glen will (hopefully 8-) back me up on, is to > expose the HTTP method in use to the SOAP developer. If they specify > the GET method, and a URI, then they don't need to specify any SOAP > message, and an HTTP GET happens which may return a SOAP envelope. That intent shows through in the spec. However, let me draw your attention to http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/#WebMethodFeature Specifically, > No standard means of representation of arguments or method names is provided by >this specification. - Sam Ruby
