HI! Could someone please look at 10173? This problem forced us back to Beta 1 and will prevent us from using Beta 3.
Thanks! Regards, Thomas > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Montag, 1. Juli 2002 05:21 > To: Axis-Dev (E-mail) > Subject: COMMITTERS PLEASE READ: beta-3 "mustfix" bug summary > > > > Here are the "musts" for beta-3, and what I can tell of their > current status. If any of this is inaccurate, please let me know. > > M 8476 - must - Rich > > Looks like this is due to an "id" attribute. Rich suggests > closing it. > > M 8646 - must - ? > > I can take this one tomorrow. I'll add a test which forces > a serialization > exception and confirms that we propagate it up correctly. > > M 9393 - must - Rich > > No information - Rich? > > M 9405 - must - Tom > > Tom has a fix for this in process, needs a little more > testing. We should > be able to nail it tomorrow. > > M 9717 - must - Tom > > Dealing with the basic set of schema types is being worked around by > having a "not supported" exception for those types we don't > handle. This > doesn't solve the problem, but makes for a more > comprehensible message. > Longer term, we have to deal more gracefully with types + > schema constructs > which we don't understand yet. > > M 9780 - must - Rick > > Per Rick's last comment, there is a fix but it's a "work in > progress". Rick, > should we expect more here for beta-3? > > M 9987 - must - Glen > > Waiting for opinions, but my feeling is to just leave the > code as it is and > mark the bug invalid, since several JDK APIs do this same thing. > > --Glen >
