Really? Static's are OK? Who knew? :-)
OK, then we should back out my fix and filter for the Skeleton interfaces. I am going on vacation now... -- Tom Jordahl -----Original Message----- From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 5:12 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/description Ser viceDesc.java Hm - static methods are perfectly fine to include in a Web Service... A better fix would be to notice the Skeleton class while introspecting, and skip it. I've made this fix in my sandbox, and can check it in if desired. --Glen > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 4:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/description > ServiceDesc.java > > > tomj 2002/07/03 13:57:14 > > Modified: java/src/org/apache/axis/description ServiceDesc.java > Log: > Fix a problem with Skeletons and WSDL generation: > The getOperationDescs() and getOperationDescByName() > APIs were showing up in WSDL when skeletons were > turned on. > > Fix: Filter out static methods when creating the > method list for a service. > > NOTE TO IBM: You may want this for Beta 3 if you care > about the WSDL generated when using skeletons! > > Revision Changes Path > 1.37 +1 -0 > xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/description/ServiceDesc.java > > Index: ServiceDesc.java > =================================================================== > RCS file: > /home/cvs/xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/description/Servic > eDesc.java,v > retrieving revision 1.36 > retrieving revision 1.37 > diff -u -r1.36 -r1.37 > --- ServiceDesc.java 3 Jul 2002 17:50:21 -0000 1.36 > +++ ServiceDesc.java 3 Jul 2002 20:57:14 -0000 1.37 > @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ > for (int i = 0; i < methods.length; i++) { > Method method = methods[i]; > if (Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers()) && > + !Modifier.isStatic(method.getModifiers()) && > method.getName().equals(methodName)) { > createOperationForMethod(method); > } > > > >
