Incidentally, for now I'm going to suggest that we generate schema in the WSDL which simply accepts xsd:any for message-style services. Next step will be to allow embedding/importing schemas.
--Glen > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:51 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12923] - Message Services > don't support m > uliple methods anymore > > > > Namespace does matter in the RPC case, but we will try to > fall back to ignoring it, which I think is actually a BAD > thing, and I also think ignoring it is especially bad for > doc/message services. > > If you want to have no namespace (i.e. <method>) that should > be fine, but I think we shouldn't just accept anything. > We're going to need to emit schema for this stuff eventually, > and that should dictate what people send. > > How about this: > > We'll generate OperationDescs for every allowed method on > Message-based services. If you specify QNames in the WSDD, > they'll be mapped as per usual to those methods. If you > don't, we will use the namespace of the service as specified > in the WSDD to generate QNames, defaulting to "". So: > > <service name="foo" provider="java:MSG"> > <parameter name="allowedMethods" value="*"/> > <parameter name="className" value="Foo"/> > </service> > > public class Foo { > public Element [] method1(Element [] arg); > public Element [] method2(Element [] arg); > } > > will look for "<method1>" and "<method2>". If you add: > > <namespace>http://foo</namespace> > > to the WSDD, we'll then look for "<ns:method1 > xmlns:ns='http://foo'>", etc. > > --Glen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:33 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12923] - Message Services don't support > > muliple methods anymore > > > > > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12923>. > > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12923 > > > > Message Services don't support muliple methods anymore > > > > > > > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-23 > > 16:32 ------- > > Does the namespace matter in the RPC case? Not sure, but I > > don't think it does. > > My inclination would be to get it back to the way it was so that > > it doesn't break existing users. If its possible to extend it so > > that it will _also_ support the notion of namespace > qualification then > > that could be added in addition to the non-NS qualification support. > > >
