Dan,
You can call MessageContext.getCurrentContext() instead of explicitly getting the
message context
as a parameter.
Thanks,
dims
--- Dan Kamins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would seem important to preserve access to the MessageContext (as some of
> the previous method signatures did). I don't see how this captured in your
> proposal for those three method sigs.
>
> Sorry if I'm off here, but I'm just jumping into all this, and you sounded
> urgent in your ALL CAPS RFC. The current MessageContext-containing
> signature is the one I am planning on using (for flexibility), so I'd hate
> to see it go.
>
> --
> Dan Kamins
>
> -----
> Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to make THESE THREE the accepted APIs for message-style service
> methods:
>
> public class MessageService {
> public SOAPBodyElement [] bodyMethod(SOAPBodyElement [] bodies)
>
> public SOAPEnvelope envelopeMethod(SOAPEnvelope envelope)
>
> public Element [] bodyAsDOMMethod(Element [] bodies)
> }
>
> I think these make a lot more sense than what we've got now.
>
> IF THIS WILL AFFECT YOU IN A NEGATIVE WAY, or IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THESE
> CHANGES, \
> please send mail to axis-dev in reply to this message.
>
> -----
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
