Just spoke to Richard....Problem still exists. He tried .NET client/WSDL2Java and NOT 
DII (with
WSDL specified in the service).  PLEASE SEE MY ZIP FILE that recreates the problem at
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=3120

-- dims

--- Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard,
> 
> Is this true?
> 
> Can you verify that these bugs are no longer a problem and update bugzilla with that
> information?
> 
> 
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yiet, Richard Liyong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 6:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Axis 1.0 release plan
> 
> 
> Hi, Dims:
> 
> Issues 12636, 12753 might be no longer issues with the 9/24 nightly build.
> 
> Richard
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 5:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Axis 1.0 release plan
> 
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> Thanks,
> dims
> 
> --- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BACKGROUND:
> > 
> > Many users have requested a v1.0 so that they can work from a relatively 
> > stable base. Some users have even remained on Apache SOAP until v1.0 of 
> > Axis is available. Now Axis has surpassed Apache SOAP in function, 
> > performance, and interoperability and, in particular, has passed Sun's 
> > JAX-RPC and SAAJ compliance tests, we are planning to ship v1.0 
> > essentially as it currently stands.
> > 
> > However, this is far from the end of the road for Axis. There is more 
> > documentation to be written; the SOAP v1.2 spec. needs to be tracked to 
> > completion and implemented fully; major functional enhancements and 
> > architectural improvements are being considered. We particularly 
> > encourage you to submit improvements to the documentation, however large 
> > or small and in any format, to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > PLAN:
> > 
> > We have achieved nearly a steady state whereby the number of fixes 
> > targeting a 1.0 release seems to remain constant at 12 +/- 6.  At the 
> > bottom of this note is the current list.  The oldest bug was reported 
> > against a nightly build in June, the newest was opened yesterday.  In 
> > order for us to ship, we need to look at this differently, and not aim 
> > for perfection.  Once we get over the hurdle of shipping this release, 
> > maintenance and followon releases should come more quickly.  The main 
> > thing to focus on is to get control over the rate at which new bugs are 
> > injected.
> > 
> > This does not imply a moratorium on the opening of new bugs that can be 
> > considered as candidate for release.  Instead, the focus needs to shift 
> > from fixing problems that we have lived with for months to fixing and 
> > eliminating regressions that can be, and are being, introduced late in 
> > the cycle.
> > 
> > Therefore, the following release plan is proposed for Axis 1.0:
> > 
> >    Code Freeze / Tag Date - Wed, 25 Sept, 2002, early a.m.
> >    Target for release - first week in October
> >    Release Manager - Sam Ruby
> >    Release Announcement -
> >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Once release freeze is achieved, inclusion of fixes into the release 
> > requires consensus of active axis committers.  Deferring of a fix 
> > requires simple majority.
> > 
> > Fixes are to continue to be made on the "HEAD" of the release.  Once 
> > there is consensus that a particular fix is to be included in the 
> > release, I'll merge it into the branch.  In order to make this as smooth 
> > and as painless a process as possible for the release manager, I'll ask 
> > that committers show restraint in committing unrelated fixes to the HEAD 
> > during this time in areas of the code that might interfere with the 
> > merge process.
> > 
> > RELEASE CRITERIA:
> > 
> > * all Axis unit and functional tests pass.
> > 
> > * SAAJ and JAXRPC TCKs pass.
> > 
> > * All fixes targeted to 1.0 are either fixed or reassigned.
> > 
> > * Confirmation that the released version works on all servlet containers 
> > for which there is a volunteer, including at a minimum Tomcat, JRun, and 
> > WebSphere.
> > 
> > CURRENT BUG LIST:
> > 
> >    ID   Sev  Pri  Owner     State              Summary
> > 10585  Blo  Hig  axis-dev  REOP No serializer error is generated
> > 12636  Blo  Oth  axis-dev  REOP Axis rc1 support for multiple output
> > 12886  Blo  Hig  gdaniels  NEW  Axis serializes when it shouldn't
> > 12923  Blo  Hig  axis-dev  NEW  Message Services don't support muliple
> > 12753  Cri  Oth  axis-dev  REOP problem while deserializing output
> > 12833  Cri  Hig  tomj      NEW  Axis clients fail to extract the value
> > 12367  Maj  Oth  axis-dev  NEW  re: java2wsdl fails when parameter
> > 12685  Maj  Oth  axis-dev  NEW  RC1 - Setting "PROP_DOMULTIREFS" looses
> > 12758  Maj  Oth  axis-dev  NEW  Deserialization of complex classes
> > 10365  Nor  Hig  tomj      NEW  If input/output names don't match,
> > 10944  Nor  Oth  gdaniels  NEW  Soap envelope cleared after onFault() in
> > 11595  Nor  Oth  gdaniels  NEW  AxisServlet ignores wsdd: "service"
> > 12803  Nor  Oth  axis-dev  NEW  (de)serialization of an object which
> > 12867  Nor  Oth  scheu     NEW  array of bean_b inside bean_a
> > 
> > - Sam Ruby
> > 
> 
> 
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Reply via email to