Whoa! You will merge interop4 to HEAD!?!?! I'll veto that right now. It
doesn't pass functional-tests! We NEED to keep the head branch clean.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/07/2002 09:27:39 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRP Cenc
ComplexRpcEncServiceTestCase.java
OK, Dims needs both the header and interop4 branch.
We don't pass all-tests, but Dims said he would fix that as Glen and I are
still working on the interop tests (which is much higher priority).
So Glen and I will merge interop4 to HEAD.
Dims will take a look at fixing the functional-tests which fail.
The header stuff can go it also.
I am not happy with putting our source tree in to a CVS cuisinart mere
hours before walking in to the interop, but it seems we have no choice.
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRPCenc
ComplexRpcEncServiceTestCase.java
Sam Ruby
>
> But Glen and I have been running hard and fast (particularly with
> respect to running all the functional tests before check in ;-) so we
> didn't want to mess up the world.
>
> The tests don't pass right now on the branch, otherwise I would say
> we should merge to HEAD and continue our work. We still have lots of
> work to do today (doc/lit faults). Have you had a chance to work on
> the attachment tests Sam? I think that is our biggest hole for
> tomorrow.
So the plan is to go into soapbuilders with a version of Axis that
doesn't pass the functional tests? I'm not sure that is wise.
> In any case, is someone wants to pick up the interop4 branch and fix
> the functional tests today, that would be great, otherwise we can
> just wait till after the interop.
Anything I check in will be on the HEAD.
- Sam Ruby
