+1 I need the better implementation of Utils.getOperationQName.
R J Scheuerle Jr wrote: >Now that the interop4 branch has been merged into head, I am initiating a >new vote to move >explicitHeaderWork into the head. > >This work contains: > * Better rpc/literal support in the emitters and runtime...as described >in previous notes. > * Support to identify parameters and return values as header values. > * Support in the serialization/deserialization to read/write values >from the headers. > * Some minor api additions to the Call object to identify >parameters/return values as headers. > >This code does not regress any of the testcases. > >Rich Scheuerle >IBM WebSphere & Axis Web Services Development >512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115) > > >
