DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13602>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13602 array bug in response XML document Summary: array bug in response XML document Product: Axis Version: 1.0-rc2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Major Priority: Other Component: Serialization/Deserialization AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, if we invoke a Web Service method which has as its return type a certain custom class, and that class contains a member which is an array (of a custom or primitive type), then the response SOAP document is wrongly formed. Example: Let's assume thet we have the following two classes: class Buri1 { public String a; public Buri2[] arr; } class Buri2 { public String s; } and we have the following WS method on a SOAP server: Buri1 BuriMethod(Buri1 b) { Buri1 ret = new Buri1(); b1 = b; return ret; } and let's assume that we call this method, after putting several Buri2's in the arr field of the parameter b. As I have observed, in such cases, in the response SOAP message the array of Buri2's does not appear as an array of Buri2's, instead it appears as n distinct Buri2's, so where the client expects an array of Buri2's, it gets only a Buri2, that's why it writes out the following error message or a similar one: "could not convert Buri2 to Buri2[]". I would mention that this error appears only in such a case, it works fine if the return type of the WS method is an array of Buri2's. I would also like to mention that I can avoid this bug by making a getter/setter method pair for the array of Buri2's member (arr) in Buri1. Then the response XML is formed correctly, there appears the array of Buri2's! Nevertheless, I think it would be possible and desirable that this bug be fixed, to not be forced to use getter/setter methods for array members if someone doesn't want to (it already works fine if the a WS method parameter contains an array or the return type of the WS method is an array, so one more little step and it will hopefully also work fine when the return type of the WS method contains an array). Thanks.