+1. Sure Glen... Thanks, dims --- Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can we merge these two back together? I think the reason they were split out was >something to > do with TCK compliance, but I can't see how that would be affected by whether or not >Call > properties are available via the MessageContext. > > Call.setProperty() should do what it used to, namely make properties available to >the whole > runtime on the client side. I don't think users should need to worry about which >properties > propagate into the MessageContext and which ones don't. > > Opinions? > > --Glen
===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
