Nirmal Mukhi wrote:

> I can certainly help since I'm a perfect guinea pig, my runtime environment
> is very basic - I just use a JRE with Tomcat as my web server. I don't have
> any JMS product and would have to install a free one to test the JMS
> provider and SOAP/JMS support. So if somebody (Mark? ;-)) volunteers to
> reorganize the tests and start the documentation, I can help verify it is
> sufficient, and also assist in the documentation based on my testing
> experience.

hi,

i can only second this :-) my runtime environment is mostly w2k and linux
and i volunteer to do testing as well (and to work on resolving issues
and to write down all that is necessary  to get tests running ...)

i think the most important is to get to get required JMS setup to work
and to make tests/setup JMS implementation independent as much as possible
and then to document it well.  by default tests could use an open source  JMS impl
such as OpenJMS (http://openjms.sourceforge.net/) or Open3.org
(mentioned in http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/06/19/jms.html
but Open3.org site seems  be down right now and i am not sure if it is still available 
...).

using open source JMS implementation would allow us to embed required JAR files
and make running tests less painful - we would still need to write additional 
documentation
on how to set tests for all other kinds of JMS impls and maybe simplify it by
providing some kind of configuration files for different JMS impls?

thanks,

alek

Reply via email to