Implicit and Explicit Soap header support with wsdl generated stubs

[Sasha Lerner]

Hi guys

I've been following your work on impicit/explicit header support in wsdl to java generator with great interest.
But I am a bit confused on the status of whats implemented already and where

I have a project to implement WS-Security support in my application and I was hoping to use a wsdl generation for client code
I gave a crack on implementing it on my local version and came up with the very similar pattern to the one discussed.

From what I understand, the Explicit work was merged into a HEAD. I am not sure of status of Implicit support. i saw bug #13618 with diffs from Sylvain,
There is also a proposal to change Stubs to extend Calls (1 -1 relationship) which will allow much easier implicit support and makes much sense.

I tried generating code using latest from cvs and it looks like Explicit is there,
but my header still ends up in the body: _call.addParameter(..), not _call.addParameterAsHeader(..) . I can send my wsdl if someone is interested in taking a look
Changing this code , everything works fine with explicit headers.

I am very happy with the support of explicit headers, but obviously I'm looking forward to implicit header support for ws-security, for all the reasons mentioned on dev list
but I could not find any code for it in cvs. is it on hold, pending redesign of Stubs?

Could you, please update me on the status of all this work, something I'm missing, any branches?
Also, if I could help in any way, be it unit tests or bug finding , I'd be happy to.

Thanks
Sasha