I am supportive of anything that makes it so the WSDL2Java and Java2WSDL classes do NOT change. Particularly, the Emitter classes for both should work *exactly* the same way they did in 1.0.
The ant task isn't important enough to have to change the APIs for these classes... -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development -----Original Message----- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_l@;iseran.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/fromJava Namespaces.java Ok, I've been looking at the diffs in wsd2java it was namespaceMap.put(namespace, packageName); but in java2wsdl it was namespaceMap.put(packageName,namespace); so my unification of the mapping class broke the java2wsdl chain. Now it makes sense. I do want the unification to go through, as that lets us have a unified <mappingset> datatype, and to use mapping files across both tasks. I also think the wsdl2java order should take priority, as it is what we have been using in the NStoPkg.properties file; we need to retain that order to avoid breaking stuff. Dims patches will probably correct java2wsdl, but at the expense of wsdl2java. options -unify the order of ns/package mapping across tasks, though the rationale for the inversion makes sense when you think about it (one way you map from ns to package, one way you dont) -modify mapping and subclasses to have a boolean packageFirst flag which controls the order I actually quite like the second option, it gives us unity at the task level, without making changes down below ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:58 AM Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/fromJava Namespaces.java > > Yes, Dims make sure you are not reversing the sense of the mapping form the command line. > That would be *VERY* bad. > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia Server Development > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_l@;iseran.com] > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/fromJava > Namespaces.java > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:07 AM > Subject: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/fromJava > Namespaces.java > > > > dims 2002/10/25 09:07:49 > > > > Modified: java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl Java2WSDL.java > > java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/fromJava Namespaces.java > > Log: > > Fix one more "ant clean all-tests" failure. > > now I'm really confused. > This inversion is in code that I didnt touch, which implies the real defect > was actually elsewhere in my <mapping> class, which has mixed up key and > value . > >
