I'd say this would be a hack that we should avoid. WSDL is XML and using
the XML media type is appropriate. Mozilla should learn to treat the
media type appropriately, we should not have to conform to the
shortcomings of individual applications that we do not have any direct
dependencies on.
- James Snell
IBM Emerging Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(559) 587-1233 (office)
(700) 544-9035 (t/l)
Programming Web Services With SOAP
O'Reilly & Associates, ISBN 0596000952
Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous.
Do not be terrified, do not be discouraged, for the Lord your
God will be with you whereever you go. - Joshua 1:9
Mike Spreitzer/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
12/16/2002 09:03 AM
Please respond to axis-dev
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bcc
Subject
Re: Mozilla and automatic ?wsdl generation with Axis 1.0
I have noticed that Mozilla displays the XML usefully if there is an HTTP
header saying the media type is "text/plain". And IE does OK in that
situation, as long as the content begins with an XML declaration (as is
already the case for the WSDL returned by Axis). What do you think of
making Axis return an HTTP header claiming the media type to be
"text/plain"?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Jahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/16/2002 02:54 PM
Please respond to axis-user
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Mozilla and automatic ?wsdl generation with
Axis 1.0
thanks, that worked! :) :) :)
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 08:48, Jess Sightler wrote:
> Have you tried hitting the View Source button in your browser?
>
> A lot of times, Mozilla doesn't display formatted XML.
>
> ---
> Jess Sightler
>
>
> On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 14:47, Eric Jahn wrote:
> > Does anyone have this working with Mozilla and Axis 1.0? Axis seems
> > properly configured according to the happyaxis.jsp test page, and
tomcat
> > now reports no errors (I fixed the wsdd server-config error), but I
> > still can't automatically generate wsdl (even for the sample
services).
> > The Mozilla browser simply loads a blank page with no wsdl. Thanks
for
> > any insight you might have. -Eric
> >
> >
