whitlock 2002/12/18 05:53:25
Modified: java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/jms
WSIFOperation_Jms.java
Log:
Better success checks in processAsyncResponse
Revision Changes Path
1.38 +3 -10
xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/jms/WSIFOperation_Jms.java
Index: WSIFOperation_Jms.java
===================================================================
RCS file:
/home/cvs/xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/jms/WSIFOperation_Jms.java,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.37 -r1.38
--- WSIFOperation_Jms.java 7 Dec 2002 12:33:55 -0000 1.37
+++ WSIFOperation_Jms.java 18 Dec 2002 13:53:25 -0000 1.38
@@ -278,8 +278,6 @@
WSIFResponseHandler handler)
throws WSIFException {
- // workflow does not need WSIFResponseHandler!
-
Trc.entry(this, input, handler);
close();
@@ -331,9 +329,6 @@
return correlId;
}
- /**
- * workflow specific processAsyncResponse(Object, WSIFMessage, WSIFMessage)
- */
public boolean processAsyncResponse(
Object responseObject,
WSIFMessage output,
@@ -342,13 +337,14 @@
Trc.entry(this, responseObject, output, fault);
+ boolean ok = false;
try {
getOperation();
// set output message name
output.setName(fieldBindingOperation.getBindingOutput().getName());
- receiveJmsMessage(responseObject, output, fault);
+ ok = receiveJmsMessage(responseObject, output, fault);
} catch (Exception ex) {
Trc.exception(ex);
@@ -367,9 +363,6 @@
ex);
}
- // if the fault msg has any parts there must have been a problem
- boolean ok = !fault.getPartNames().hasNext();
-
Trc.exit(ok);
return ok;
}
@@ -383,7 +376,7 @@
public void fireAsyncResponse(Object response) throws WSIFException {
Trc.entry(this, response);
- // workflow does not need this yet! use processAsyncResponse
+ // use processAsyncResponse
// **NS
WSIFMessage output = createOutputMessage();
WSIFMessage fault = createFaultMessage();
