I am working on some other stuff, but Russell is also pestering me to
assess this code. I will reply later today.
Thanks,
Rich Scheuerle
IBM WebSphere & Axis Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
Glen Daniels
<gdaniels@macrome To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dia.com> cc:
Subject: RE: Q. about equals() in WSDL
generated datatypes
12/19/2002 07:59
AM
Please respond to
axis-dev
Hi Rich!
Hm - I'm trying to imagine an example for when this would actually get
used, and having trouble coming up with one. Could you elucidate? I guess
what I'm really asking is why doesn't "if (this == obj) return true" catch
this?
--G
P.S. Nice to see you back!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Q. about equals() in WSDL generated datatypes
>
>
>
> Yes __equalsCal was meant to support equals for objects that
> had direct or
> indirectly references back to the object.
>
> Rich Scheuerle
> IBM WebSphere & Axis Web Services Development
> 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
>
>
>
>
> "Steve Loughran"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
> "axis-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> om> cc:
>
> Subject: Q.
> about equals() in WSDL generated datatypes
> 12/18/2002 02:38
>
> PM
>
> Please respond to
>
> axis-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So I'm staring at the equals() method that's been generated
> for me from a
> datatype
>
> private java.lang.Object __equalsCalc = null;
>
> public synchronized boolean equals(java.lang.Object obj) {
> if (!(obj instanceof JobInfo)) return false;
> JobInfo other = (JobInfo) obj;
> if (obj == null) return false;
> if (this == obj) return true;
> if (__equalsCalc != null) {
> return (__equalsCalc == obj);
> }
> __equalsCalc = obj;
> ...tests
> __equalsCalc = null;
> return _equals;
>
>
> My q. is: what is all this __equalsCalc stuff? It implies
> that if there is
> a
> reentrant equality test then the test would return true while
> the test is
> ongoing, but since the method is synchronized, you'd be hard
> pressed to
> call
> equals() twice.
>
> Is that what the __equalsCalc is there for? To catch recursion?
>
> -steve
>
>
>
>
>