Sounds good. +1 from me.
Regards,
Hesham E. Fahmy
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Anthony |
| | Elder/UK/IBM@IBMG|
| | B |
| | |
| | 01/22/2003 12:08 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | axis-dev |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: [WSIF/VOTE] Proposed restructure to java/lib
|
|
|
|
|
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Sounds ok, +1 from me.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
"Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 22/01/2003 17:04:58
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "axis-dev list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: [WSIF/VOTE] Proposed restructure to java/lib
Guys, we voted on IRC a while ago to restructure java/lib so the jars were
in java/lib insteadm of subdirs of java/lib. This is what I propose:
* move all jars from java/lib/** to java/lib and ensure version number is
included in jar name. This is helpful to the user, who is entitled to
rename
them of course if their classpath gets too long
* create a single README.html in java/lib which describes each jar, what
uses it, what the license is, where it can be downloaded from and a pointer
to an appropriate appendix which describes the license for the jar
* change classpath.bat and classpath.sh to cope with the new structure.
I think that covers it.
We've already voted to change the structure. So please vote to agree the
details above.
Thx,
Jeremy
