----- Original Message ----- From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 17:16 Subject: Re: Axis 1.1?
> Well, a couple things: if Axis 1.1 is going to stabilize, we need to > absolutely freeze development on any new features (e.g. notice I haven't > done any additional work on the async stuff in a while :-) ...) and work > strictly on bug fixes AND we need to set a target release date. My vote > would be that by the end of next week we cut an Axis 1.1 Beta 2 and target > Axis 1.1 final for the end of Feb and focus on *nothing* but bug fixes > between now and then. I am +1 for this with the caveats that (a) if we call Beta-2 Release Candidate (1) we get more takeup and testing and (b) we apply serious triage in deciding which bugs to fix. Even bug fixes have unintended consequences...ideally the diff between the next beta and the final product should be near zero. -steve > > Can we *please* start setting and voting on milestone goals that include a > detailed list of the new features and bug fixes we plan for each upcoming > point release? > > Regarding the servlet.jar, it's the EngineConfigurationFactoryFinder class > that's looking for the default EngineConfigurationFactory. It apparently > tries to init DefaultEngineConfigurationFactoryServlet which requires the > ServletContext class to be present. Richard Sitze did some work to > address this but it appears to still be a problem under JDK 1.4. > > - James Snell > IBM Emerging Technologies > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (559) 587-1233 (office) > (700) 544-9035 (t/l) > Programming Web Services With SOAP > O'Reilly & Associates, ISBN 0596000952 > > Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. > Do not be terrified, do not be discouraged, for the Lord your > God will be with you whereever you go. - Joshua 1:9 > > > > "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 01/31/2003 05:02 PM > Please respond to axis-dev > > > To > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc > > bcc > > Subject > Re: Axis 1.1? > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 15:13 > Subject: Axis 1.1? > > > > Btw, when are we looking at releasing Axis 1.1? > > good q: ask the release manager. > > I think the long beta release has actually been pretty beneficial; takeup > of > 1.1beta has been high and its given us chance to stabilise something and > get > some extra fixes in there. Also some gotchas are still surfacing, such as > the servlets.jar need. > > On the subject of servlets.jar, what bit of client side code is it that > needs it? > > >
