Davanum,

This method of preparing a schema and then wsdl, then using ADB/XMLBEANS is
Document/Literal only right.
Also, i guess only Doc/Lit wrapped is interoperable to transfer huge amount
of xml data inbuilt inside the soap body.

Please correct me, if am wrong.

Thanks.
kiran.


Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> 
> oops forgot the link:
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-axis-user/200609.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> 
> -- dims
> 
> On 1/29/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> #1) Yes. Start with Schema first (i use XMLSPY to write xsd's). Then
>> follow instructions from Anne here to fill up the template WSDL.
>>
>> #2) Axis2 w/o a doubt.
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>>
>> On 1/29/07, mvkirankumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Davanum Srinivas for your response.
>> >
>> > OK, you advise to start from WSDL rather than java/pojo's.
>> >
>> > I got two questions:
>> >
>> > 1. But, does that mean we have to prepare a WSDL on our own first and
>> then
>> > start off.
>> > Sorry, if this question is silly. I am new to this axis world.
>> >
>> > 2. I would have a big xml data with complicated schema. So using
>> xmlbeans
>> > would work fine means, which one is stable to use xmlbeans AXIS1.4 or
>> AXIS2.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Kiran kumar.
>> >
>> >
>> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> > >
>> > > If you have a complicated schema, you should use xmlbeans. If you are
>> > > willing to sacrifice a bit of schema support for better performance,
>> > > use ADB. As i mention usually, start from WSDL/Schema. (NOT from
>> > > java/pojo's).
>> > >
>> > > thanks,
>> > > dims
>> > >
>> > > On 1/29/07, mvkirankumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> Please suggest me with the following:
>> > >>
>> > >> Which xml java binding framework should i use or which one is stable
>> to
>> > >> use.
>> > >> I have tried AXIOM sample, jibx both do not work.
>> > >> Only the samples given in axis2 works.
>> > >> if i try out something, they do not work.
>> > >>
>> > >> Please help me, to take up a robust framework to implement in my
>> project.
>> > >>
>> > >> thanks
>> > >> kiran kumar.
>> > >> --
>> > >> View this message in context:
>> > >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/-AXIS2--Which-binding-framework-should-i-use-for-complex-xml-handling-tf3137320.html#a8694267
>> > >> Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services
>> Developers
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-AXIS2--Which-binding-framework-should-i-use-for-complex-xml-handling-tf3137320.html#a8695199
>> > Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services
>> Developers
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-AXIS2--Which-binding-framework-should-i-use-for-complex-xml-handling-tf3137320.html#a8696783
Sent from the Axis - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to