xmlbeans may be an option. i've been told that you can feed multiple
schema versions and generate code.

thanks,
dims

On 4/18/07, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis/Amila,

The point was to allow for some "backwards compatible" growth of the schema
without requiring the clients to make changes.  Not necessarily to avoid
validation entirely.  If I understand correctly, JAXB 2 is limited to Java
5.  Unfortunately, I am working in a Java 1.4 environment.  Is this a
feasible approach or do most people create new versions of the wsdl and
schema?

-Joshua


On 4/17/07, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Amila,
>
> When I try running the 1.2RC2 WSDL2Java with -d jaxbri I get:
>
>     [java] Exception in thread "main"
> org.apache.axis2.wsdl.codegen.CodeGenerationException:
> java.lang.RuntimeException:
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>     [java]     at
>
org.apache.axis2.wsdl.codegen.CodeGenerationEngine.generate(CodeGenerationEngine.java
:255)
>     [java]     at
org.apache.axis2.wsdl.WSDL2Code.main(WSDL2Code.java:32)
>     [java]     at
org.apache.axis2.wsdl.WSDL2Java.main(WSDL2Java.java:21)
> ...
>     [java] Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>     [java]     at
>
org.apache.axis2.jaxbri.CodeGenerationUtility.processSchemas(CodeGenerationUtility.java:105)
>     [java]     ... 8 more
>
> This is the same error I got when I tried with RC1, as reported in Jira:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2431 The same
WSDL (and
> schema) works fine with ADB and JiBX data bindings.
>
> - Dennis
>
> Dennis M. Sosnoski
> SOA and Web Services in Java
> Training and Consulting
> http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
> Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
>
>
>
> Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/17/07, *Dennis Sosnoski* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote:
> >
> >     JAXB 2.0 should do this, though I was unable to get JAXB to work
with
> >     the Axis2 1.2RC1 WSDL2Java. Has anyone been successful in using JAXB
> >     with Axis2?
> >
> >
> > Can you test with RC2? Are you refering the bug which does not include
> > jaxb- runtime jars and jaxb template to
> > axis2-jaxb.jar?
> >
> >     JiBX will also handle this. Unlike JAXB 2.0 , with JiBX it's not the
> >     default behavior. In the JiBX binding you need to set
> >     flexible="true" on
> >     any <mapping> or <structure> element where you want to allow unknown
> >     elements.
> >
> >     In general it's not a good approach to do this kind of schema
> >     extension
> >     (especially for web services, where the schema definition should
> >     be part
> >     of the service contract). If you want to allow for extensions, use
an
> >     xs:any element as a wildcard that allows for other elements to be
> >     added
> >     in the future. Otherwise you're not actually following the schema,
> >     which
> >     defeats the whole purpose of having one in the first place.
> >
> >       - Dennis
> >
> >     Dennis M. Sosnoski
> >     SOA and Web Services in Java
> >     Training and Consulting
> >     http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
> >     Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
> >
> >
> >
> >     Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
> >     > As I understood you are looking for an databinding framwork
> >     which does
> >     > not do any validation. try jaxb.
> >     >
> >     > On 4/16/07, *Josh* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Amila,
> >     >
> >     >     If I configure a databinding approach to work with the
> >     following XML:
> >     >
> >     >     <person>
> >     >         <firstName>John</firstName>
> >     >         <lastName>Doe</lastName>
> >     >     </person>
> >     >
> >     >     Which databinding approaches will not break if I pass in the
> >     >     following XML:
> >     >
> >     >     <person>
> >     >         <firstName>John</firstName>
> >     >         <lastName>Doe</lastName>
> >     >         <age>25</age>
> >     >         <sex>M</sex>
> >     >     </person>
> >     >
> >     >     While most client applications may not want to interpret the
new
> >     >     information, I want to make sure that I can recommend a
binding
> >     >     approach that does not cause a ripple effect when new items
are
> >     >     added to the schema.  Does this clarify what I am looking for?
> >     >
> >     >     -Joshua
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     On 4/16/07, *Amila Suriarachchi*
> >     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >         On 4/14/07, *Josh* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     >         <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >             All,
> >     >
> >     >             I am looking to determine which client side data
> >     binding
> >     >             choices (castor, jibx, jaxb etc) allow backwards
> >     >             compatible schema changes (eg addition of a new field)
> >     >             without throwing an exception.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >         What you exactly mean by backword compatible schema?
> >     >         e g.  if you add a new element to a complex type with
> >     >         minOccurs 0 then this should work properly with  the
> >     requests
> >     >         you got earlier as well. But in this case it the way you
> >     write
> >     >         schema and it has nothing to do with the databinding frame
> >     >         work as far as it correctly interpret the schema.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >             I am hoping to recommend some solutions to my
> >     clients that
> >     >             would allow me to make backward compatible schema
> >     changes
> >     >             without causing a ripple effect.  Has anyone come
across
> >     >             this information?
> >     >
> >     >             Regards,
> >     >
> >     >             Joshua
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >         --
> >     >         Amila Suriarachchi,
> >     >         WSO2 Inc.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > Amila Suriarachchi,
> >     > WSO2 Inc.
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Amila Suriarachchi,
> > WSO2 Inc.
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to