Dino,
In my case, it is primarily the first reason you mention. Castor
has better coverage of XML schema features. Plus it also allows
validation. Another minor thing : the Axis generated code serializes
null object references using xsi:nil, whereas, wilth Castor, the XML
element itself doesnt get produced. This, IMHO, is cleaner XML, though
both forms are correct.
Regards,
Kenneth
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:11:02 -0800, Dino Chiesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the typical reason for using Castor with AXIS?
> - AXIS is missing features that Castor has?
> - Castor is already in use and the org wants to add webservices
> capability
>
> - something else?
