Well not really.... I catch errors messages about services... The users rate how well they felt the service processed the data... Work out the uptime of services etc. The speed of the service related to other services that do the same thing... Etc,
I don't really know the parts that others are doing but Its a very interesting project/application if nothing else. And your right alot of it does come down to how well you design the system. Dan On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:36:36 -0900, Elaine Nance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I think design, design, design is going to be your problem > first rather than code, code, code. > > What you're describing sounds like your application is a tunnel > through which services pass so you can meter them. Kind of > defeats the measurements, doesn't it? > > Global Handler as switchboard . . . > > Dan O'Neill wrote: > > Ahhh... you see... I'm building a distributed system. Its part of a > > much larger project and Im actually only building a prototype > > application and doing some modelling. > > > > The application however needs input from both the client and service. > > This input is passed to my application service which then proceeses it > > and uses it to build a model of both the client users and the services > > that they use. > > Its all to do with WebService reputation and which webservice to > > choose for a particular job. I cant really say any more because its a > > rather large college project that many people are working on. > > > > The client you see then rates the webservice and so forth..... But you > > see if I make a soap call while the handlers are set to global it will > > start a never ending loop which eventually crashes everything from > > client to server! > > > > I hope that answers some of your questions..... > > > > Dan > > > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:00:57 -0900, Elaine Nance > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Dan, > >> > >>Here are also simple questions, not particularly aimed at you: > >> > >>Why would your service be responsible for what the subscriber > >>does to handle the responses? If the interface is fully > >>specified by the wsdl then the client will be able to consume it. > >> > >>What, specifically, are you doing that you need to concern > >>yourself with client-side handlers? > >> > >>I'm not being a smartie here. I see a lot of posts similar to > >>yours and I wonder why: > >> > >> 1) the provider wants to be responsible for the subscriber - > >>frankly I'd love it if our enterprise IT even *thought* about > >>providing usable client code. I will absolutely settle for a > >>wsdl which doesn't make me hand-code parsers for every > >>string-wrapped xml document. > >> > >> 2) so many services don't seem to be designed as services - > >>it's as if the cart is driving the horse, as in "we already have > >>the application/interfaces/classes that we'd like to expose as a > >>web service" . . . > >> > >> 3) SOAP is decided as the solution when the problem hasn't > >>been analyzed > >> > >>Elaine > >> > >> > >>Dan O'Neill wrote: > >> > >>>I'm tired trying to get them to work. Do Client-side service-specific > >>>handlers work? If you put them in client-config.wsdd? I know that if I > >>>change them to global they work? > >>> > >>>I've got some working by using setClientHandlers() in the client code > >>>but I don't always have the luxury of changing people's java client? > >>> > >> > >><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> | Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. > >> | -- Pablo Picasso -- > >><~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. > | -- Pablo Picasso -- > <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > -- Classic Family Guy..... "Yes, but no sprinkles. For every sprinkle i find, i shall KILL you." - Stewie "And Joe, I've had new neighbors before, but none of them were half the man you are. Since you're half a man already, that splits them into some kind of fraction I can't even measure." - Peter "Hello, 911? It's Quagmire. Yeah, it's caught in the window this time." Quagmire "I got an idea, an idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about." - Peter
