I agree entirely -- I feel strongly that the output of wsdl2java should be public domain so users can slap whatever license they want on it. It just wasn't obvious to me (or more correctly I didn't think it would be obvious to all the lawyers in the world :-) that this was already the case.
David
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 13:10 +0530, Venkat Reddy wrote:
> I'm not sure if it is good idea for axis to impose licensing on
> generated code. For example, if a dataEclispe generates some bootstrap
> java code from its templates for a POJO or web app, which you later
> modify for your needs, which licence applies to the code? IMO, Same
> should hold good for wsdl2java, except that the amount and complexity
> of gerated code is more here. I think its upto the user of the
> wsdl2java to apply their own license.
>
> - venkat
>
>
> On 4/19/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't think we impose any license on the generated code. Do you want
> > us to make this explicit in our docs? (Please open a JIRA issue if you
> > think we should)
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > On 4/19/05, David Kaelbling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What license is code generated by wsdl2java under? Apache 2.0? Public
> > > domain? I couldn't find an explicit reference in the docs.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > David
> > >
> > > --
> > > David KAELBLING 100 Beaver St., Waltham MA 02453-8425
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 781-891-5100 ext 121, fax -5145
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >
>
--
David KAELBLING 100 Beaver St., Waltham MA 02453-8425
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 781-891-5100 ext 121, fax -5145
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
