You can search the documentation as easily as I can...

On 7/6/05, Ravi Krishnamurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Anne.
> 
> One last question: Are there any examples for wrapped and document
> styles dynamic invocation with Axis.
> 
> Regards,Ravi
> 
> Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> 
> >Document style requires that you wrap all your parameters up into a
> >single bean. Otherwise, it's identical to wrapped and RPC styles.
> >
> >Anne
> >
> >On 7/6/05, Ravi Krishnamurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Thanks Anne.
> >>Then if I have to use the document style webservice as the style in the
> >>invocation client, does it involve lot of work. Would appreciate any
> >>pointers.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Ravi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Ravi,
> >>>
> >>>.NET services (indicated by the .asmx extension) are wrapped
> >>>doc/literal style by default. Most web services platforms now generate
> >>>wrapped doc/literal by default, but you can't assume that all document
> >>>style services are in fact wrapped. You must look at the WSDL to make
> >>>that determination. If the input message element has the same name as
> >>>the operation name, then it's likely that it's wrapped.
> >>>
> >>>Anne
> >>>
> >>>On 7/6/05, Ravi Krishnamurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Anne:
> >>>>I have been playing using Axis to invoke webservices from a dynamic
> >>>>invocation client.
> >>>>
> >>>>For example: the following webservice
> >>>>http://chs.gotdotnet.com/quickstart/aspplus/samples/services/MathService/VB/MathService.asmx?WSDL
> >>>>defines the operation Add as document/litreal.
> >>>>
> >>>>But I can invoke it successfully if I set the style to be wrapped.
> >>>>Wondering if all the document literal webservices can be accesible using
> >>>>the wrapped style.
> >>>>
> >>>>Also I have an xml document in string. Want to send the xml to invoke
> >>>>the webservice and get the response as xml and use it. What is the bst
> >>>>way to do this.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks for your time.
> >>>>
> >>>>Regards,
> >>>>ravi
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
>

Reply via email to