Hi Anne,
I posted a message earlier, having had problems with MIME
attachments myself. What is the current state-of-the-art alternative to
sending attachments that the axis team intends to support?
- Ben
Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
My recommendation: don't send attachments.
If that's not an option, then I suggest you file an enhancement
request to improve the efficiency of attachments processing, although
I suspect the dev team won't be too keen on spending the time on this
request.
Axis2 uses MTOM, and I expect it to be must more resource efficient
than SOAP w/ attachments.
Anne
On 7/25/05, csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne
This method works, but it has its limitations. A few months back I had
implemented this and found while trying to build mime multipart related
messages I frequently got out of memory errors unless I bumped up the JVM,
although this worked great for smaller attachments, increasing the JVM's
memory was not an acceptable solution for me at the time. Granted the
client sends the message and the server is not configured properly it will
have a similar problem.
Your thoughts on this would be great.
Regards
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
See the WS-I Attachments Profile for the standard way to define MIME
attachments in WSDL:
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/AttachmentsProfile-1.0-2004-08-24.html.
Anne
On 7/25/05, csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Naresh
From my understanding of WSDL there is no standard way to describe
services that accept MIME/DIME attachments. The best way is to add a
comment at the top of the WSDL stating which methods accept attachments
in what encapsulation format.
Regards
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Agarwal, Naresh wrote:
Can someone point me to some public WSDLs, which support MIME/DIME
attachments?
thanks & regards,
Naresh Agarwal
