Bug report AXIS-2160 created

Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Please log a bug report.

thanks,
dims

On 8/2/05, Volodymyr Ilchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello All,

I'm using Axis 1.2.1 and trying to implement UDDI v.3 spec
(http://www.uddi.org/). However, I have a question with respect to
methods that do not return a response but still have to execute
synchronously. Here is an example from UDDI spec:

void delete_tModel(Delete_tModel body) throws DispositionReport;

Axis produces the following response in case the method call succeeds:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
  <soapenv:Body>
    <delete_tModelResponse xmlns="urn:uddi-org:api_v3"/>
  </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

However, delete_tModelResponse is not defined under
"urn:uddi-org:api_v3" namespace. Thus, the response is invalid.

I would expect the response to contain an empty SOAP Body element, like:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
  <soapenv:Body/>
</soapenv:Envelope>


Here are snippets of UDDI WSDL's provided by OASIS (you can find the
complete WSDL's on uddi.org):

==== PortType ====

<message name="successMessage"/>
<message name="delete_tModelMessage">
       <part name="body" element="uddi:delete_tModel"/>
</message>
<operation name="delete_tModel">
       <input message="tns:delete_tModelMessage"/>
       <output message="tns:successMessage"/>
       <fault name="error" message="tns:dispositionReportFaultMessage"/>
</operation>

==== Binding ====

<soap:binding style="document"
transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<operation name="delete_service">
       <soap:operation soapAction="delete_service"/>
       <input>
               <soap:body use="literal"/>
       </input>
       <output>
               <soap:body use="literal"/>
       </output>
       <fault name="error">
               <soap:fault name="error" use="literal"/>
       </fault>
</operation>


Best regards,
Volodymyr Ilchenko




Reply via email to