Dirk wrote: > So the best is to wait between the requests? We made the registry changes as outlined in the original document; decreased the amount of time spent in TIME_WAIT state, and increased the number of TCP/IP dynamic ports available--it enabled us to more than double the number of virtual users during performance testing without encountering these errors.
If you can't (or don't want to) modify your Windows registry, then you'll need to keep those simultaneous requests at a lower level, or accept that some of them will fail... or, as you said, modify your code in some way so that you don't overload the available ports. Meghan _________________________________ Meghan Pietila Java Middleware Architect Sales & Service Management Program US Bank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. ==============================================================================
