sounds like a GSOAP streaming problem. On 12/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Davanum. > > I wonder though, why I'm having my attachment problems. > [It's possible it's coded badly!] > Like, when I get my response from the GSOAP server, it's grand - but then > the attachment streams in after it (I watched it on TCPMon ) . > It's the waiting for the attachment that's causing my problem really - > that's where the delay lies. > > James > > > > > Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 08/12/2005 16:11 > Please respond to > [email protected] > > > To > [email protected] > cc > > Subject > Re: Performance When Reading Attachments > > > > > > > not yet. > > On 12/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks > > > > Would you recommend Axis 2 for better attachment performance? > > James > > > > > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 08/12/2005 12:39 > > Please respond to > > [email protected] > > > > > > To > > [email protected] > > cc > > > > Subject > > Re: Performance When Reading Attachments > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is in 1.3 > > > > On 12/8/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes - I noticed this alright. > > > > > > So, will stream attachments stop the "blocking" nature of attachment > > > reading? > > > > > > Also, is this implemented in the Axis1.3 release, or will I have to go > > > with the CVS version? Or is it Subversion now? > > > > > > Is there any guide as how to use the streaming method? > > > > > > Thanks for your help > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > 07/12/2005 18:17 > > > Please respond to > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > To > > > [email protected] > > > cc > > > > > > Subject > > > Re: Performance When Reading Attachments > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2221 there is support > > > for streaming attachments. > > > > > > thanks, > > > dims > > > > > > On 12/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Can anyone help me with this at all? > > > > > > > > I'm considering using the current CVS build to see if any > improvements > > > > have been made. > > > > > > > > Like, I've heard about streaming attachments - they sound good - if > I > > > can > > > > work out how to use them. > > > > > > > > But this is a critical area for my application, so if anyone has any > > > > performance hints for DIME attachments at all I'd really appreciate > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > 06/12/2005 14:39 > > > > Please respond to > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > To > > > > [email protected] > > > > cc > > > > > > > > Subject > > > > Performance When Reading Attachments > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I'm really hoping someone can finally solve this for me. > > > > > > > > When I receive a message with a DIME Attachement, I get my Message > > > object > > > > back quite quickly, but it takes ages for it to read the attachments > > > from > > > > the message. > > > > > > > > I considered that this could be because it's waiting for the > > > attachments, > > > > but unfortunatly, I can't work out how to just read the attachments > > > > straight away. > > > > > > > > Has anyone had this problem or found the solution? > > > > > > > > I am using Axis for my client, and someone else is using a C++ GSOAP > > > > client, and they get the data in no time. > > > > So any help in improving attachement performance would be > appreciated > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > This email is intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). > > Any > > > > unauthorised disclosure, copying or distribution of the confidential > > > > information contained therein, or the taking of any action based on > > it, > > > is > > > > prohibited. The sender disclaims any liability for the integrity of > > this > > > > email. Legally binding declarations must be in written form. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > > > > > > > This email is intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). > Any > > > unauthorised disclosure, copying or distribution of the confidential > > > information contained therein, or the taking of any action based on > it, > > is > > > prohibited. The sender disclaims any liability for the integrity of > this > > > email. Legally binding declarations must be in written form. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > > > > This email is intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). Any > > unauthorised disclosure, copying or distribution of the confidential > > information contained therein, or the taking of any action based on it, > is > > prohibited. The sender disclaims any liability for the integrity of this > > email. Legally binding declarations must be in written form. > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > This email is intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). Any > unauthorised disclosure, copying or distribution of the confidential > information contained therein, or the taking of any action based on it, is > prohibited. The sender disclaims any liability for the integrity of this > email. Legally binding declarations must be in written form. > >
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
