Anne
On 2/2/06, Cyrille Le Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
WS-I Basic Profile, the reference for SOAP interoperability, says it
prefers "literal" rather than "encoded" :
Extract : "As a result, the Profile prefers the use of literal,
non-encoded XML."
Chapter : "4.1.7 SOAP encodingStyle Attribute"
URL : http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.0-2004-04-16.html#refinement16448072
Unfortunately, I did not find in this spec any clear statement saying
that "document" (in a wrapped style) is preferred to "rpc".
However, you will find many articles that say "document" is preferred to "rpc".
Cyrille
--
Cyrille Le Clerc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.0-2004-04-16.html
On 2/2/06, Jyotishman Pathak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dov,
>
> I found this article [1] from IBM to be quite useful. At the same time, I am interested in knowing more about your investigation.
>
> Thanks,
> - Jyoti
>
> [1] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-whichwsdl/?ca=dgr-devx-WebServicesMVP03
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/2/06, Balaji D L <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Can you share your analyse with us ??
> > It will be very useful.
> > Regards
> > Balaji
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Dov Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: 02 February 2006 14:21:37
> > Subject: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding
> >
> > I have done a bunch of investigating to determine the differences/benefits/limitations of the 3 styles of WSDL generation. In general it seems that the preferred version is Document Literal. Are there any other opinions as to the most popular version?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dov Rosenberg
> > Inquira Inc
> > 370 Centerpointe Circle, ste 1178
> > Altamonte Springs, FL 32701
> > (407) 339-1177 x 102
> > (407) 339-6704 (fax)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > AOL IM: dovrosenberg
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jyotishman Pathak
> WWW: http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~jpathak
