Thanks for the quick answer, but that's not a solution to my problem.
I have a Gui-Framework for my Client-side code, containing a frame for
entering the parametervalues
for an operation(i.e. the parameter of the input-message of the operation).
>From this input-frame i get
an xml-string (conforming to the type-description of the parameter in the
wsdl-file). now i want to use 
the axis-generated deserializer to transform this xml into a java-object
which i can use with the invoke-method
of the operation. this should be done outside of any axis-generated
classes. but i have no idea how to tell
the deserializer to actually "deserialize" my xml-string. any ideas or is
it impossible to this ?

regards,

        Hans

At 18:48 13.02.2006 -0800, you wrote:
> utilize the class for the bean you want to return. The Java2WSDL will use
>the bean classes to add the type definition to the WSDL for the bean that
>will be passed back to the client class. If you use the user guide
>examples, check out Example 5. I use Eclipse 3.1.1 with the WTP 0.7 plugin,
>which makes it very easy to do all this. In this case of Example 5, once
>you have used WSDL2Java to create the client classes, you will notice that
>it has created a new version of the Order bean, and it has the deserializer
>code added to it, down towards the bottom.   Also check out this page, it
>may help you: 
>http://www.sosnoski.com/presents/java-xml/axis/java-service.html  After I
>got this one working, I modified it to return an array of beans, which was
>fairly easy.     HTH 8)     Jim
>
><> wrote:  Hello,
>
>i have a question about the (Bean)Desializer-classes from Axis. I have
>created the client-classes
>for a webservice using wsdl2java. There is a class Order.java with methods
>to get a Serializer/Deserializer
>for this class. How can i use the Deserializer returned by this method to
>transform an XML-file (or a string 
>containing the xml) into an Object of type order or is this impossible?
>The Api-doc und the axis-user-guide.html doesn't really help me  further.
>Any suggestions?
>
>Thanks
>
>Hans
>
>
>  
>

Reply via email to