Hi all, I also opposed the idea of a seperate mailing list sometime back but I have to admit that there's a whole lot of folks interested in Axis2 right now which seems to be making the lists crowded (primarily by forgetting the axis2 prefix). If the Apache infra has no problem I would say we should go for a seperate list.
Ajith On 2/27/06, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, when we first started I oppose this becouse we need Axis 1 > developer and users to look at Axis2 and to give feedback. But I think > now it is good time to move to a seperate list .. taking one more step > closer to 1.0 > > Srinath > > On 2/26/06, Jim Azeltine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to propose once again to create a seperate list for Axis 2. I > > realize that it makes it so developers have two lists to deal with, but I > > believe it would be better. The focus of the two efforts is really very > > different, bug resolution and stability for Axis 1, new product development > > for 2. > > > > Jim > > > > > > Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I see increasing traffic on issues regarding Axis2. This mail is just a > > reminder to pass the mails to the correct people. > > > > As you all can see we use the same mailing list to address the issues > > related to both Axis 1.x and Axis2. So we came up with a small > > convention to distinguish between those two. > > Please put the prefix "[Axis2]" in to the subjects of all your mails to > > Axis2. This way you have a better chance of getting a good and early > > reply from axis2 team. > > > > This is even mentioned in our site as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Chinthaka > > > > > > > > > -- > ============================ > Srinath Perera: > http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/ > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani > -- Ajith Ranabahu
